Antimicrobial effect of the photodynamic therapy on caries lesion: an in vitro study
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The current evidence suggests that antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with the application of methylene blue as a photosensitizer and red laser activation is suitable for disinfecting carious tissue. However, since many dental practices lack access to lasers, a standard dental curing light could be an alternative light source. This study evaluated the use of fuchsin as a photosensitizer in aPDT and a blue light-emitting diode (LED) dental curing light for the disinfection of carious dentin. Sixty permanent third molars were selected, cut to obtain flat dentin surfaces, and subjected to a 15-day cariogenic challenge with Streptococcus mutans. The specimens were allocated into four groups (n=15): no disinfection; fuchsin; blue LED irradiation; and aPDT (fuchsin plus blue LED irradiation). S. mutans counts were obtained in the remaining carious dentin from all specimens across all groups. Results were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (Student-Newman-Keuls). The percentage reduction in microbial load was 96.07% for aPDT, 88.85% for LED alone, and 85.46% for fuchsin alone. SEM demonstrated a greater reduction in microbial burden after aPDT with fuchsin and blue LED light, with removal of the smear layer and exposure of dentin tubules. Fuchsin-mediated aPDT using blue LED irradiation significantly reduced microbial load and may represent a viable alternative for the disinfection of carious tissue, particularly in settings without access to laser devices.
Ethics Approval
All procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas; Certificate of Submission for Ethical Appraisal: 5066322.1.0000.5481) on November 25, 2022. Each patient gave written informed consent to the study protocol prior to donating their teeth for research.CRediT authorship contribution
Ana Clara Miarelli Fortuna, José Roberto Rodini Caldari, Maria Fernanda Marchi, Maria Olivia Marcondes Pinto: data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, visualization, writing – original draft preparation, writing – review & editing; Carlos Eduardo Fontana: investigation, methodology, supervision, visualization, writing – original draft preparation, writing – review & editing; Victor Elias Arana-Chavez: investigation, methodology, visualization, writing – original draft preparation, writing – review & editing; Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – original draft preparation, writing – review & editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Supporting Agencies
This study was supported by undergraduate research scholarships from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundo de Apoio à Iniciação Científica/Reitoria PUC-Campinas (Brazil), which were essential for enabling student participation in scientific research, as well as for supporting the execution of laboratory procedures and data collection, thereby contributing to the advancement of knowledge in this field.Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.